Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). 771 BCE: Start of the Eastern Zhou dynasty (and the 'Spring and Autumn Annals' period) in China 753 BCE: The Founding of Rome 594 BCE: Solon is appointed archon of Athens and proposes popular reforms; a system of land taxation introduced in the state of Lu, China 575 BCE: Servius Tullius becomes King of Rome 560 BCE: Peisistratus seizes the Acropolis, makes himself tyrant of Athens, but is . volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. PRX editors make every effort to arrive at a clear decision on the disposition of a manuscript within a reasonable time. Directly from with editor, to decision under process. Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. What does this mean and should I contact the editor? The journal opened for submissions on April 20, 2016. Production But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the . Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. When a journal displays the decision in process status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. Editor decision started might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but thats not necessarily the case. A decision by the editor in chief is the . Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. ii a. I gave them his address. edit: so no. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. ISSN 1097-6256 (print). or help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? I submitted a MS to a Nature-Branded Journal on 9/10 and today the status changed to "Editor Decision Started". Their role is to. However, because the number of appeals has been growing to the point that it threatens to overwhelm our editorial resources, we have recently implemented a new system for considering them. [CDATA[> Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. If a paper was rejected because the authors failed to persuade the referees that they had excluded alternative interpretations, then new data or analyses are likely to be required for the appeal to have any chance of success. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. Currently working as an Assistant Editor for the Discover Journals under Springer Nature. Hi! The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. Research suggests that . After the Editor in Chief assigns the manuscript to an editor, the next task is "waiting for reviewer assignment" by that assigned editor. b. In practice, of course, this is impossible, and editors must instead rely on a few referees representing a cross-section of informed opinion in the field. Manuscripts should be submitted via our online manuscript submission system. on 05 Apr, 2021. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. If so, how close was it? Dont infer anything from unavailable data. A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. [CDATA[> Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. In my experience rejection is quite rapid - 48 hours or so. The reviewers only make recommendations. How did it go for you after this? "Advice please! How long and formal should a paper revision letter to the editor be? The peer review file is published online as a supplementary peer review file. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience and apparent conflicts of interest. Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that . Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors. At some point, they may come back to you and ask you to suggest names (additional names, if you had already given some when you originally submitted the paper). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles [CDATA[> One's knowledge, images, and emotions regarding the past have an impact on future actions. Authors are understandably motivated to dispute rejections; scientists are evaluated on their publication record, and even if their own positions are secure, senior authors feel a responsibility to promote the professional advancement of their students. v. t. e. Sovereignty generally refers to the supreme authority of a state or territory. rev2023.3.3.43278. It only takes a minute to sign up. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, Awaiting AE recommendation status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AEs decision for acceptance is pending. Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1002-917. and JavaScript. on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. The paper is rejected with no offer to reconsider a resubmitted version. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. Currently, the status is "Peer Review Over" and "Decision Started" since more than 15 days. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. However, the Editor, in the rejection letter, provided an objective explanation for this long wait. To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. Nature has space to publish only 8% or so of the 200 papers submitted each week, hence its selection criteria are rigorous. Things just always take much longer than we think they would. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. Is it possible to create a concave light? Space in Nature is extremely limited, and so format requirements must be strictly observed, as advised by the editor handling the submission, and detailed in the manuscript formatting guide. paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. So dont feel upset! However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. Theoretically Correct vs Practical Notation. 1124. Is it possible to rotate a window 90 degrees if it has the same length and width? Authors are provided with an encrypted link to this system after their paper has been accepted. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. 2002 Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Thank you for visiting nature.com. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. You can appeal to the editorial board, giving a point-by-point argument against the editors views. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Share your stories! How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. 117. It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience . The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. Its been more than 2 months since I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Which type of forging is used for Flashless forging? Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. The Academic Editor being consulted will be asked to provide an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. Individuals often make decisions based on what they believe to be the historical purposes and goals of an institution. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. resubmitnoveltyappeal, Resubmitpoint-by-pointresponse letterresubmitresponse letterresubmitresponse letternature, Proofreadingresubmit, Proofreadinglicence to publish, NatureNatureNature, wileynature science, Nature CommunicationsNatureNature CommunicationsPeer-review, Nature Communicationstransparent peer-reviewgetNature Communicationsget50%Nature Communicaitons, sciencenature. How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal? My thesis aimed to study dynamic agrivoltaic systems, in my case in arboriculture. Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. [CDATA[> Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. Papers are evaluated along multiple dimensions, including technical reliability, novelty and interest, but the final decision to accept or reject must collapse all this information into a single binary choice. this is indeed the general case, also in my journal. The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Table 11 sketches the different situations the editor may encounter and the decision s/he usually makes in each of these situations. After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. It can impact your confidence and make you question your ability and skill. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission and publication. How do I align things in the following tabular environment?

Cox And Son Funeral Home Jellico, Tn Obituaries, Grace Retreat Village Stephen Darby, How To Get Cursor Back On Lenovo Laptop, Soulsville Charter School Teachers Fired, Articles E